It's interesting to look at articles on the use of Gabapentin in cats and see how “different” the author's takeaway is, from the actual results of the study. I think it has to do with how deeply a reader or veterinarian actually digs into the references.
Here's an example: An author makes assessments and assertions about the effectiveness of Gabapentin in cats and says that it helps. But neglects that every single study they referenced ALSO used other medications WITH the Gabapentin.
So, I tried to be careful in assessing this.
I mean, it looks good?
But just how good, I am doubtful honestly.
No harm I am sure. The drug is super safe.
But I think for the immediate future, there's a lot of “overpromising” going on.